6 minutes
Moving your Jekyll site from GitHub Pages to GitLab
For the last several months, I’ve been pondering the move of this site from GitHub Pages to GitLab. I have several reasons which I won’t get into here, but the recent news regarding the acquisition of GitHub by Microsoft gave me the impetus to get this done. I ran into several interesting “hiccups” during the process, and decided to write this post to help anyone else going down this road.
Obviously, the first step is to migrate your site source files from GitHub to GitLab. In my case, I have a local copy of this site cloned on my local system, and I used this as the source. For other options I recommend you read the GitLab document Import your project from GitHub to GitLab
. To migrate this site, my first step was to create a new empty project on GitLab named bftsystems.gitlab.io
. I then cloned this empty repository to my local system, copied my site source files into the empty project, then pushed the results back to GitLab. Here is an overview of the commands I used locally.
cd git
git clone git@gitlab.com:bftsystems/bftsystems.gitlab.io.git
cp -R bftsystems.github.io/* bftsystems.gitlab.io/
cd bftsystems.gitlab.io
git add --all
git commit -am "Initial commit to Gitlab hosting"
git push origin master
Once your repository has been moved to GitLab, nothing will work immediately and no pages will be built. Unlike GitHub, GitLab uses a CI (continuous integration) configuration file to instruct the GitLab site Runners how to build your site. This process is a little more complex than GitHub, but also more flexible. Primarily, this flexibility is what brought me to GitLab for hosting.
To setup the build process, you must create a file named .gitlab-ci.yml
in your repository. The contents of this file will direct GitLab how to build your site. The full documentation on this process can be found in the document Hosting on GitLab.com with GitHub Pages
. As this site is built using Jekyll, I followed the steps in the document outlining the configuration process specifically for Jekyll.
This is where things get a little interesting. When it comes to building the CI file for Jekyll, the GitLab documentation is somewhat vague, and misses several edge cases. Sadly, I seemed to have run into many of those edge cases. Firstly, you must configure your site to use the correct version of Jekyll. This will not be obvious, as the errors provided by GitLab may be non-intuitive. In my case, the errors I received were related to Liquid syntax errors
in several source files. After some digging, I discovered these issues were caused by a Jekyll version mismatch. To resolve this, I confirmed the version of Jekyll I’m using locally (bundle exec jekyll --version
), and updated the Gemfile
in my repository to use this version (more on this later).
Further to the Jekyll issue, you must also ensure any Ruby gems (aka plugins) required by your site are added to your site Gemfile
as dependencies. Many dependencies included in GitHub by default are not included by GitLab, which will cause build issues. I also believe this is an issue for many other Jekyll templates which assume they are being hosted on GitHub Pages and will encounter dependency issues when hosted on GitLab. To confirm which gems are required, open your site _config.yml
file, and locate the section labelled gems:
or plugins:
(depending on the Jekyll version). Here is the section from this site as an example.
# Plugins (previously gems:)
plugins:
- jekyll-paginate
- jekyll-sitemap
- jekyll-gist
- jekyll-feed
- jemoji
Using this information and the Jekyll version I confirmed previously, I updated the Gemfile
for my site accordingly1.
source "https://rubygems.org"
gem 'jekyll', '3.6.2'
gem 'jekyll-paginate'
gem 'jekyll-sitemap'
gem 'jekyll-gist'
gem 'jekyll-feed'
gem 'jemoji'
Interestingly, once these changes were made, I now received page build errors from GitLab regarding Invalid US-ASCII characters in several of the CSS files. After further digging through the CSS source files and searching on-line, I discovered GitLab does not support UTF-8
by default in their Docker instances. A setting was required in the CI file to enforce this on every build (thanks to this
Jekyll issue report for the discovery). Once this additional configuration was added to the CI file, the site built successfully on GitLab (woot!). Here is the final version of the .gitlab-ci.yml
file with all the necessary changes for your reference.
# requiring the environment of Ruby 2.3.x
image: ruby:2.3
# add bundle cache to 'vendor' for speeding up builds
cache:
paths:
- vendor/
before_script:
- bundle install --path vendor
# the 'pages' job will deploy and build your site to the 'public' path
pages:
stage: deploy
script:
- bundle exec jekyll build -d public/
variables:
JEKYLL_ENV: production
LANG: "C.UTF-8"
artifacts:
paths:
- public
only:
- master # this job will affect only the 'master' branch
Once the build was finished, the site was immediately available through the GitLab Pages subdomain (eg. https://bftsystems.gitlab.io/
). The final step in the process was to update DNS for my domain to use GitLab Pages. Once again, this was a little more complex than with GitHub, as there is no automated https integration using Let’s Encrypt (which GitHub has added recently). I won’t go into the specific details of the process here, as it is well documented in the following articles.
- Hosting on GitLab.com with GitLab Pages - Step 4: Add your custom domain covers the steps to update your DNS records for GitLab Pages
- Securing your GitLab Pages with TLS and Let’s Encrypt
- Setting up GitLab Pages with CloudFlare Certificates
In the end, I added two A
records for my domain, one for the apex or root domain, and a second for the www subdomain. I could have used a single wildcard record, but I try to avoid using wildcard DNS records (just a personal preference). I then added both these domains, with their associated SSL certificates under Settings, Pages. I found both domains were required to avoid any SSL warnings when using some browsers.

As I’ve never used Let’s Encrypt previously, I went through their process to request new certificates and am currently using them for the site. However, I’ll likely switch to CloudFlare in future. This will avoid the complexity of automating regular certificate updates when using Let’s Encrypt (90 day expiry versus 15 years with CloudFlare, not a difficult choice).
All in all, I’m happy with my new setup and have learned a lot moving to GitLab Pages. As always, I hope you found this post useful, or at least interesting. To contact me or provide feedback, use the Contact page, or message me on Twitter .
Thanks!
-
One final note, updating these dependencies in my site
Gemfile
has reduced the site build-time in my local test environment by 50%. I’m not sure why this has occurred, but a happy side effect nonetheless. ↩︎